Saturday, December 10, 2011

Reflection on AED 200 Blog

onestly I did not know what to expect from this class. I did know anyone who had taken it so I did not have any peer feedback. I was a little nervous as to how an art course online was going to work but it works. My one expectation was to earn the art credits I needed and that was accomplished. But something else also happened as a result of taking this class. I look at things differently with more of an “eye.” I look for the elements and principles in things around me and that are presented to me. The knowledge of them was very helpful in creating a brochure for an assignment in another class. Also I actually enjoyed my last visit to the Albright Knox Art Gallery. I hadn’t been there in years but it was fascinating to see works by artists in our textbook on display. “What is art?” Art is all around us. Art can come from anywhere as long as it works. Art is a communication from the artist to the viewer. The message may not always be clear and sometimes interpretation is left entirely up to the viewer. Before taking this class to me art was drawing, painting, and sculpture. I never viewed art below the surface, looked for meaning or appreciated different media or techniques. I did not have a favorite artist before and honestly I cannot say I have an absolute favorite now. I like the art from the Renaissance a lot. I also like works that are created using different techniques such as pointillism and the quick strokes by the impressionists. I am open to different works. I do know that I am not really a fan of abstract art. I have taken online classes before so this was not a new experience for me. I was unsure of an art class on online but it worked out much better than I expected.

self portrait project

Self Portrait Blog The inspiration pieces I chose were self portraits of Edgar Degas, Kathe Kollwitz, and Vincent Van Gogh. I found them on my virtual visit to the Metropolitan Museum of Modern Art in New York City. I picked them because they seemed fairly simple and not over done. The portrait of Van Gogh is the only one in color. I decided to use pencil to create my self-portrait. I think it is easier to work with than acrylic paints. Also it can be shaded, which I like, and pencils can be erased to make changes. This was a challenging project for me. I decided to try to capture a realistic likeness of myself. It was a lot more difficult than I thought. To try to overcome this I kept looking in the mirror as well as looking at the photo I took of myself for this project. I also kept asking family members what they thought and what changes they thought would help. This piece represents me because it is an indication of effort and determination. Creating art is not my strength but I really tried on all the projects for this class. To create my self portrait I used shading (which reminded me of creating the value scale), symmetry in balancing the face, straight lines to create the hair, beard and eyebrows, contour lines to make the eyes, nose, ears, outline of the face and neckline, proportion (I attempted to make the features as proportional as they are on my face), and texture (eyebrows). Even though I found this project challenging and frustrating I did enjoy working on it. I think my final artwork is a nice portrait but it does not look like me. I sketched and shaded and erased and looked in the mirror but I do not think I was able to capture a resemblance. It definitely gives me respect for those who are able to create successful self portraits.

Friday, December 9, 2011

week 15 reflection blog

Week 15 Reflection Blog Before I decided on an exhibit to critique I reviewed the following exhibits: “Emotions” by Nicole Annalora, “Faces of Art” by Katherine L Mooar, and “Art in the New Age” by Kathy Rondinelli. I ultimately chose the exhibit “Art of Ice Hockey” by Ryan Malinowski. I chose this exhibit because I used to play ice hockey, my brother still plays hockey and I am a fan of ice hockey in any way shape and form. I felt this would fulfill the requirement of having knowledge of a subject before you start a critique. The biggest challenge in completing this project was staying focused on being objective and analyzing the work. When I had concerns I referred to the notes I took while watching the video, The Critics Stories from Inside Pages. I really did not like judging my peers. I feel that they are in the same boat as I am. We are all learning and we are not experts. I would like to know what my peers said about my exhibit. I put lot of thought into it and would like to know how it was received. The next question is on a scale of 1-10 how would I rate my article and why? I would give myself a 9.5. Why? Number one is no one is perfect. Also I spent a lot of time viewing other exhibits finding one I could connect with. When I found the exhibit I did not just glance through it. I went through it numerous times over several days taking notes and studying the exhibit. I did not want to be unfamiliar or uninformed. I cannot say that this was my favorite project. I did like being able to view other exhibits and seeing the different topics my peers decided to focus on and how they were executed. That was the enjoyable part of this project. Writing the critique was the unfavorable part.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

week 15 blog

Week 15 Video Review Blog\ Greenberg on Art Criticism: An Interview by T.J. Clark, 1981 In this video Clement Greenberg admits that “writing about visual arts is harder than writing about music. This is because you can write about music formally. He also stated that he has to remind himself to be relevant and that several times he let preferences cloud his articles. He discussed Modern and Abstract art. He also discussed that fact that “good art can come from anywhere.” Through his writings he counts on a cultivated public and hopes the public will respect what they cannot understand. Greenberg referred to Ruskin and Sylvester on the topic of intuition. He stated that they knew the value of judgment, that judgment is intuitive and judgment comes with experience. Greenberg on Pollock: An Interview by T.J. Clark This interview was based on the life and works of the artist Jackson Pollock. Green recalls Pollock’s fiancĂ© telling him in the 1940s that Pollock would be a great pointer. He tells of his own discussions and influence with Pollock move to non-easel painting. He admits that he was wrong and that his works was “high fluting journalism.” Being discontent with cabinet painting Pollock moved to working on unstretched canvas and in doing so moved away orderliness. Greenberg acknowledges that there are all kinds or orderliness and that good art is always orderly. He also stated the only demands on an artist is that there works need to be good. Pollock moved to “drip” painting and in doing so was not accepted by his peer. Greenberg felt that his paintings failed not because of the technique but because they failed to the eye. He shared that artists seek fame and money and that Pollock achieved notoriety. Fame refers to exposure in newspapers and magazines which is related to art critics. An Introduction to the Italian Renaissance (Giorgio Vasari) Giorgio Vasari wrote the “Lives of the Artistis” which is the basis of art criticism. It allowed future generations to learn about the old masters. This video demonstrated that art continually changes. It gave an insight to the works of: Giotto, Ghiberti, Donatello, Paolo Uccello and Masaccio, Pierro della Francesca, Botticelli, da Vinci, Raffaello, and Michelangelo. This video showed how art emerged and changed after the Byzantine era. Most importantly it gave insight into how artists built on the works of their predecessors. The art continually changed and developed. The Critics Stories from Inside Pages Initially I was disappointed that this did not include art critics but when I was done viewing this video I realized that this was probably a good thing because it gave an overview of the role of a critic. Critics get the public to think and off fresh ideas. The critics in this video art passionate about the fields they critic and love their jobs because it changes everyday. The difference between informed a review and criticism was revealed. It was stated that superior professional criticism is when the critic brings experience to the table and makes a persuasive argument. Effective criticism requires logic, emotional support and creativity. Critical thinking, based on the components outlined by Bloom and Krathwohl’s components consists of: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Good critics write with their audience in mind and their works are well written and well constructed. The process of good writing is results from the taking of numerous notes. Elements of superior critics include: the six elements of critical thinking, good writing, the placement of works in historical and social contexts, and the ability to make connections. There is always a danger of mixing reviewing with criticism. The Internet has opened an expansive audience that can be reached by critics. To become a critic one needs: to write, find out if you like it, see if people want to hear what you want to say, know your subject, and have knowledge of the classics. Criticism is not necessarily negative it is based on analyzing, classifying, and looking at the big picture. Colonial Encounter: Views of Non-Western Art and Culture This video demonstrated by reviewing the 1900 World Fair in Paris how Western prejudice, ethnography, and art consumption have counteracted real intercultural dialog. Provided were examples of works created by the colonies in Africa. It did not matter how intricate or worthy the works were not considered art but rather crafts. The difference in the treatment of colonies and the exploitation of its peoples was brought to light. This was reflected in the architecture in the colonies as well as how they were presented at the Fair. Also highlighted was the fact that material culture is tied to the appreciation of descendants. Material culture recognizes formal quality and skill but is devoid of meaning. The Western world views the works through the eyes of Western art but give the works no history or cultural meaning. Jackson Pollock: Michael Fried, T.J. Clark in Conversation The conversation between modernist critic Michael Fried and social historian T.J. Clark took place in from of the work “Lavender Mist” by Jackson Pollock. It was enlightening to see different points of view. They discussed their conflicting reasons as to why Pollock has a place in the history of modern art. There was a discussion of Opticalism, that emerged from Greenberg, was discussed. They discussed their disagreement on the character of “Lavender Mist” and how the historical significance cannot be separated from the pictorial significance.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Reflection Journal to Project 4

Reflection on Art Curation Project Blog The theme of my project was based on two factors. The first is my love for my two dogs and the second the work Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash by Giacomo Balla, that I viewed on my last visit to the Albright Knox Art Gallery. The dog in the painting reminded me of one of my dog and I was also impressed with the sense of movement the painting portrayed. I really did not know what I was going to title the exhibit so for the blog I called it “A Dog’s View.” After reading Professor Tabone’s response to my theme I changed it to “Man’s Best Friend.” Initially I really wasn’t sure how successful I was going to be in finding works that matched my theme because I did not want to use pet portraits. I do not know what the problem was but I was unable to connect to ArtStor. Also when I tried to open other resources that came up as not available. I think if I had my research would have been easier. I started searching the internet. I did not want to use works that were just a result of a Google search that had no background or the information I needed to accompany the works in my exhibit. As a result I visited many galleries, some I was able to gather works and information from, and others not. I also visited the British Royal Collection. It was an experience but it was very time consuming. I was very pleased and surprised at the number of works I found. Once I gathered the works I set out to set up the exhibit. I reviewed the samples provided of past projects several times. Then I thought about my visit to the Albright Knox Art Gallery that preceded this project. The exhibits were shown on white walls, and even though the works were framed, there were no distractions of other colors or designs to take away from the works. I decided to keep my power point design simple to use a white background and to try to vary the exhibit by changing the layouts. I opened with the work by Balla that inspired the exhibit. Then I divided the works I found into categories: the oldest works I found, dogs within family/owner portraits, paintings of dogs that were not necessarily portraits, dogs within still life paintings, and dogs as a part of landscapes. I ended the exhibit with a work by Ethel Mars, “Untitled (Woman and Dog from Back,” that reminded me of the work that inspired the exhibit. The way I organized myself was I put each work on an index card with the necessary information on the front. I reviewed each work several times and added comments on the back. From this information I formed by descriptions. Once I decided on a format using the index cards made it easier to create the power point. I was pleased with the end result. I was happy that I found more than just pet portraits, in fact in some areas I had to edit and exclude works that I did not feel fit my exhibit or I felt were overly repetitive. I was also pleased that I was able to explore the works of artists some that I had heard of and others I had not. I was also able to explore different types of paintings, methods, and styles. I hope others will enjoy viewing my exhibit.